I’m asking myself . . . “Why are males so insecure in themselves, given what is in their neural character in heritage and composition?”
There is the inner world of self, and the outer world of others, both of which we live and have to navigate. Are males aware of this dynamic, and are they demonstrating any awareness of cohesion between the two?
It’s puzzling when looking at both of these aspects—inner and outer worlds—and seeing the degree of awareness in consciousness and integration on a scale of 1-10.
Shouldn’t there be basic qualifications to be a citizen of a free society, which would also qualify an individual to actively participate in a democratic republic as a political candidate representing the many?
These kinds of questions become more relevant as the global community expands and integrates. It is obviously a core fulcrum in the functioning of group living beyond its animal origins. There should be a requirement of minimum capacity of mental reflection in order to vote for representation in government, be a representative of The People in government, and to be allowed to fully participate in a free society.
In the animal world it is physical strength and intense violence that the male utilizes to hold on to power, to dominate. A male’s intellectual capacities, as well as emotional intelligence, are demanded in these changing times. Dominance alone no longer fulfills the requirement for survival.
The story of human culture is one of managing these evolutionary characteristics. The ideals tend to neglect the actuality of the general character and capacity of managing this in order to function viably. Not all humans can control these impulses, nor are they able to integrate their self-interest with the collective interest. People who have yet to evolve in this capacity should not be in positions of guidance and authority, nor should they qualify as a citizen, assuming to have a functional social awareness.
The dilemma is in the vast numbers of those who have yet to evolve, to meet the demand of our evolutionary calling towards a higher awareness, and the need for cooperation, unifying the whole for the survival of all Life on planet Earth. It feels like the split between what is biologically given in its random process of selection, and hormonally based infusions of sexual impulses in breeding, absent a filter for its inherent pathologies.
Eugenics is the buzzword, but when questioning the health of a human’s body or mind, the directive of choice becomes contaminated in primal urges and ego exclusivity.
There seems to be a factor in self-identity that wants to be free of the other in varying degrees, regardless of the organic interdependence. It is a distortion of ego-power seeking domination, preventing others from their own free will, by imposing demands on them—both rational and irrational.
A lack of discernment is demonstrated when this ego-powered dominance can only exclude—their reactive emotional convictions altogether blinding rational reality.
So, how does rational perception take over, replacing the irrational dominance-impulse of the primitive tribal force, in the world of the animal kingdom? Is this representative of the majority of human beings?
How can we influence such an organic force, a pathological force, rooted in our neural nature? Can it be transformed from an impulse of male dominance to a more inclusive compassion towards all of life?
This impulse is the weapon of tyranny. It is the cancer of human neural psychosis and collective inclusion.
Can this pathological characteristic from the neural character of the human species be brought into balance?
How much longer do we have, how far can we go, if we don’t measure and control the birthing of neural pathologies in our reproduction?
It is essential to manage our uncontrolled, random, breeding-based, primitive, sexual chemistry if we are to survive as a conscious species.